↓ Skip to main content

Structural basis of high‐order oligomerization of the cullin‐3 adaptor SPOP

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural basis of high‐order oligomerization of the cullin‐3 adaptor SPOP
Published in
Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), August 2013
DOI 10.1107/s0907444913012687
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura K van Geersdaele, Mark A Stead, Christopher M Harrison, Stephen B Carr, Helen J Close, Gareth O Rosbrook, Simon D Connell, Stephanie C Wright

Abstract

Protein ubiquitination in eukaryotic cells is mediated by diverse E3 ligase enzymes that each target specific substrates. The cullin E3 ligase complexes are the most abundant class of E3 ligases; they contain various cullin components that serve as scaffolds for interaction with substrate-recruiting adaptor proteins. SPOP is a BTB-domain adaptor of the cullin-3 E3 ligase complexes; it selectively recruits substrates via its N-terminal MATH domain, whereas its BTB domain mediates dimerization and interactions with cullin-3. It has recently been recognized that the high-order oligomerization of SPOP enhances the ubiquitination of substrates. Here, a dimerization interface in the SPOP C-terminus is identified and it is shown that the dimerization interfaces of the BTB domain and of the C-terminus act independently and in tandem to generate high-order SPOP oligomers. The crystal structure of the dimeric SPOP C-terminal domain is reported at 1.5 Å resolution and it is shown that Tyr353 plays a critical role in high-order oligomerization. A model of the high-order SPOP oligomer is presented that depicts a helical organization that could enhance the efficiency of substrate ubiquitination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Chemistry 6 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#2,253
of 2,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,537
of 207,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,784 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.