Title |
CO modulation of ion channels
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Pharmacology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/bph.12760 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C Peers, J P Boyle, J L Scragg, M L Dallas, M M Al‐Owais, N T Hettiarachichi, J Elies, E Johnson, N Gamper, D S Steele |
Abstract |
Carbon monoxide is firmly established as an important, physiological signalling molecule as well as a potent toxin. Through its ability to bind metal-containing proteins it is known to interfere with a number of intracellular signalling pathways, and such actions can account for its physiological and pathological effects. In particular, CO can modulate the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide and cGMP levels, as well as regulate MAP kinase signalling. In this review, we consider ion channels as more recently discovered effectors of CO signalling. CO is now known to regulate a growing number of different ion channel types, and detailed studies of the underlying mechanisms of action are revealing unexpected findings. For example, there are clear areas of contention surrounding its ability to increase the activity of high conductance, Ca(2+) -sensitive K(+) channels. More recent studies have revealed the ability of CO to inhibit T-type Ca(2+) channels and have unveiled a novel signalling pathway underlying tonic regulation of this channel. It is clear that the investigation of ion channels as effectors of CO signalling is in its infancy, and much more work is required to fully understand both the physiological and the toxic actions of this gas. Only then can its emerging use as a therapeutic tool be fully and safely exploited. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 24% |