You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Employing an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict breastfeeding intention, initiation, and maintenance in White British and South‐Asian mothers living in Bradford
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Health Psychology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02083.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Lawton, Laura Ashley, Shoba Dawson, Dagmar Waiblinger, Mark Conner |
| Abstract |
Despite reported differences in breastfeeding rates amongst women of different ethnic groups, little research has investigated whether the thoughts and feelings (social cognitions) of women from these different groups during pregnancy influence their later breastfeeding behaviour. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Macao | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,026,383
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#461
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,327
of 175,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.