You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved short‐term outcomes of kidney transplants in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death with the use of normothermic regional perfusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Transplantation, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ajt.16622 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Padilla, Elisabeth Coll, Cristina Fernández‐Pérez, Teresa Pont, Ángel Ruiz, Marina Pérez‐Redondo, Eva Oliver, Lander Atutxa, José M. Manciño, Domingo Daga, Eduardo Miñambres, José Moya, Bárbara Vidal, José M. Dueñas‐Jurado, Fernando Mosteiro, Alberto Rodríguez‐Salgado, Esperanza Fernández‐García, Ramón Lara, Domingo Hernández‐Marrero, Belén Estébanez, María Luisa Rodríguez‐Ferrero, María Barber, Fernando García‐López, Amado Andrés, Carlos Santiago, Ana Zapatero, Rafael Badenes, Francisco Carrizosa, José J. Blanco, José L. Bernal, Francisco J. Elola, Cristina Vidal, Christel Terrón, Pablo Castro, Jordi Comas, Beatriz Domínguez‐Gil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 36% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Grenada | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#758,293
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#168
of 5,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,780
of 455,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#5
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.