You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical anatomy of D3 lymphadenectomy in right colon cancer, gastrocolic trunk of Henle and surgical trunk of Gillot – a video vignette
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Colorectal Disease, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/codi.14358 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Á. García‐Granero, L. Sánchez‐Guillén, D. Fletcher‐Sanfeliu, J. Sancho‐Muriel, E. Alvarez‐Sarrado, G. Pellino, J. J. Delgado‐Moraleda, L. Sabater Ortí, A. A. Valverde‐Navarro, M. Frasson |
| Abstract |
Complete mesocolon excision (CME) and D3 lymphadenectomy(D3-L) necessitate a high tie of mesenteric vessels (1,2). D3-L highlights lymph nodes dissection of Surgical Trunk of Gillot (STG) and Gastrocolic Trunk of Henle (GCTH) areas (3). Laparoscopic dissection of these areas is associated with intraoperative bleeding, which may culminate in a fatal outcome(4). The STG is the adipose tissue between the ileocolic vein and the GCTH. GCTH is a venous trunk consisting of the right gastroepiploic vein, anterior superior pancreatic-duodenal vein and the superior right colic vein (5). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 24 | 30% |
| Italy | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 2 | 3% |
| Turkey | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 26% |
| Scientists | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 46% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#871,276
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Colorectal Disease
#88
of 2,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,467
of 305,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Colorectal Disease
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.