↓ Skip to main content

COVID‐19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization due to SARS‐CoV‐2: A test‐negative design study based on Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) sentinel surveillance in Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COVID‐19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization due to SARS‐CoV‐2: A test‐negative design study based on Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) sentinel surveillance in Spain
Published in
Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses, July 2022
DOI 10.1111/irv.13026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clara Mazagatos, Concepción Delgado‐Sanz, Susana Monge, Francisco Pozo, Jesús Oliva, Virginia Sandonis, Ana Gandarillas, Carmen Quiñones‐Rubio, Cristina Ruiz‐Sopeña, Virtudes Gallardo‐García, Luca Basile, María Isabel Barranco‐Boada, Olga Hidalgo‐Pardo, Olalla Vazquez‐Cancela, Miriam García‐Vázquez, Amelia Fernández‐Sierra, Ana Milagro‐Beamonte, María Ordobás, Eva Martínez‐Ochoa, Socorro Fernández‐Arribas, Nicola Lorusso, Ana Martínez, Ana García‐Fulgueiras, Bartolomé Sastre‐Palou, Isabel Losada‐Castillo, Silvia Martínez‐Cuenca, Mar Rodríguez‐del Águila, Miriam Latorre, Amparo Larrauri, The SARI surveillance VE group in Spain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,175,598
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses
#178
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,810
of 432,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.