You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of the implementation of best practice guidelines on nurse’s evidence‐based practice and on nurses' work environment: Research protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jan.14598 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Esteban‐Sepúlveda, Albert Sesé‐Abad, Laia Lacueva‐Pérez, Manuela Domingo‐Pozo, Sergio Alonso‐Fernandez, Marta Aquilue‐Ballarin, Ana Isabel Barcelo‐Martinez, Estíbaliz Cristobal‐Dominguez, Jesús Bujalance‐Hoyos, Consuelo Dossantos‐Sanchez, Manuel Angel Pascual‐Pascual, Elisabeth Garcia‐Arteaga, Maria Galisteo‐Gimenez, Gemma Mas‐Dalmau, Maria Pilar Heredia‐Reina, Silvia Roca‐Marti, María Perez Riart, Laura Albornos‐Muñoz, Esther Gonzalez‐Maria, Juan Carlos Fernández‐Domínguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 67% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 41% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,359,519
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#1,042
of 5,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,920
of 424,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#17
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.