↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, September 2012
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esperanza Naredo, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Richard J Wakefield, Ingrid Möller, Peter V Balint, Emilio Filippucci, Annamaria Iagnocco, Zunaid Karim, Lene Terslev, David A Bong, Jesús Garrido, David Martínez-Hernández, George A W Bruyn, on behalf of the OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force*

Abstract

To produce consensus-based scoring systems for ultrasound (US) tenosynovitis and to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of these scoring systems in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Other 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Engineering 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,900,532
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2,147
of 7,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,089
of 168,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#15
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.