You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josef S Smolen, Robert Landewé, Johannes Bijlsma, Gerd Burmester, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Maxime Dougados, Jackie Nam, Sofia Ramiro, Marieke Voshaar, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Daniel Aletaha, Martin Aringer, Maarten Boers, Chris D Buckley, Frank Buttgereit, Vivian Bykerk, Mario Cardiel, Bernard Combe, Maurizio Cutolo, Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings, Paul Emery, Axel Finckh, Cem Gabay, Juan Gomez-Reino, Laure Gossec, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Johanna M W Hazes, Tom Huizinga, Meghna Jani, Dmitry Karateev, Marios Kouloumas, Tore Kvien, Zhanguo Li, Xavier Mariette, Iain McInnes, Eduardo Mysler, Peter Nash, Karel Pavelka, Gyula Poór, Christophe Richez, Piet van Riel, Andrea Rubbert-Roth, Kenneth Saag, Jose da Silva, Tanja Stamm, Tsutomu Takeuchi, René Westhovens, Maarten de Wit, Désirée van der Heijde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 14% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| France | 6 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 78% |
| Scientists | 7 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1603 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 195 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 173 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 168 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 154 | 10% |
| Other | 152 | 9% |
| Other | 324 | 20% |
| Unknown | 437 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 579 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 122 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 47 | 3% |
| Other | 180 | 11% |
| Unknown | 520 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#237,180
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#88
of 7,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,980
of 326,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.