You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomised controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, November 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pinki Sahota, Mary C J Rudolf, Rachael Dixey, Andrew J Hill, Julian H Barth, Janet Cade |
| Abstract |
To assess if a school based intervention was effective in reducing risk factors for obesity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 437 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 103 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 12% |
| Researcher | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 93 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 59 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 39 | 9% |
| Psychology | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 82 | 18% |
| Unknown | 93 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,811,830
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#17,030
of 64,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,477
of 46,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#31
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.