You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol—the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trisha Greenhalgh, Geoff Wong, Justin Jagosh, Joanne Greenhalgh, Ana Manzano, Gill Westhorp, Ray Pawson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 29% |
| Canada | 11 | 22% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 51% |
| Scientists | 15 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 376 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 21% |
| Researcher | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 19% |
| Unknown | 73 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 74 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 12% |
| Psychology | 28 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 56 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,176,218
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,096
of 25,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,739
of 275,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#38
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.