You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maternal alcohol intake prior to and during pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes: evidence from a British cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jech-2013-202934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camilla Nykjaer, Nisreen A Alwan, Darren C Greenwood, Nigel A B Simpson, Alastair W M Hay, Kay L M White, Janet E Cade |
| Abstract |
Evidence is conflicting regarding the relationship between low maternal alcohol consumption and birth outcomes. This paper aimed to investigate the association between alcohol intake before and during pregnancy with birth weight and gestational age and to examine the effect of timing of exposure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 23% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 27% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 356 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 10% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 74 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 13% |
| Psychology | 26 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 80 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#421,254
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#203
of 4,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,477
of 236,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.