You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prevalence and causes of vision loss in East Asia in 2015: magnitude, temporal trends and projections
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313308 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ching-Yu Cheng, Ningli Wang, Tien Y Wong, Nathan Congdon, Mingguang He, Ya Xing Wang, Tasanee Braithwaite, Robert J Casson, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, Aditi Das, Seth R Flaxman, Jost B Jonas, Jill Elizabeth Keeffe, John H Kempen, Janet Leasher, Hans Limburg, Kovin Naidoo, Konrad Pesudovs, Serge Resnikoff, Alexander J Silvester, Nina Tahhan, Hugh R Taylor, Rupert R A Bourne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,916,870
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#4,781
of 6,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,297
of 353,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#78
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.