You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How European primary care practitioners think the timeliness of cancer diagnosis can be improved: a thematic analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Harris, Hans Thulesius, Ana Luísa Neves, Sophie Harker, Tuomas Koskela, Davorina Petek, Robert Hoffman, Mette Brekke, Krzysztof Buczkowski, Nicola Buono, Emiliana Costiug, Geert-Jan Dinant, Gergana Foreva, Eva Jakob, Mercè Marzo-Castillejo, Peter Murchie, Jolanta Sawicka-Powierza, Antonius Schneider, Emmanouil Smyrnakis, Sven Streit, Gordon Taylor, Peter Vedsted, Birgitta Weltermann, Magdalena Esteva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 60% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#15,097
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,027
of 356,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#530
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.