↓ Skip to main content

Nilotinib as Coadjuvant Treatment with Doxorubicin in Patients with Sarcomas: A Phase I Trial of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nilotinib as Coadjuvant Treatment with Doxorubicin in Patients with Sarcomas: A Phase I Trial of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2018
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Alemany, David S. Moura, Andres Redondo, Javier Martinez-Trufero, Silvia Calabuig, Carlos Saus, Antonia Obrador-Hevia, Rafael Ramos, Victor H. Villar, Claudia Valverde, Maria Angeles Vaz, Javier Medina, Irene Felipe-Abrio, Nadia Hindi, Miguel Taron, Javier Martin-Broto

Abstract

Nilotinib plus doxorubicin showed to be synergistic regarding apoptosis in several sarcoma cell lines. A phase I/II trial was thus designed to explore the feasibility of nilotinib as co-adjuvant of doxorubicin by inhibiting MRP-1/ P-gp efflux activity. The phase I part of the study is presented here. Nilotinib 400 mg/12 h was administered in fixed dose from day 1 to 6, and doxorubicin on day 5 of each cycle. Three dose-escalation levels for doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2, 65 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2 were planned. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a total of 4 cycles. Eligible subtypes were retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and unresectable/ metastatic high-grade chondrosarcoma (CHO). Thirteen patients were enrolled: 7 CHO, 4 LPS and 2 LMS. In 46 cycles administered, the most relevant grade 3/4 adverse effects per patient were: neutropenia 54%, febrile neutropenia 15%, and asthenia 8%. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Only one dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia) was reported in the third dose-level. As regards efficacy, there were 1 partial response (1 LPS), 9 SD (5 CHO, 2 LPS, 1 LMS) and 3 progressive diseases (2 CHO and 1 LMS). ABCB1 and ABCC1 RNA expression levels decreased by 58.47-fold and 1.47-fold respectively on day 5 of the cycle. Combination of MRP-1/P-gp inhibitor, nilotinib, as co-adjuvant with doxorubicin is feasible; it appears not to add substantial toxicity compared to doxorubicin alone. Pharmacodynamic study supports this concept. The recommended dose for the phase II part for doxorubicin was 75 mg/m2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Librarian 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Engineering 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,163,617
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#5,758
of 12,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,210
of 350,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#99
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.