You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PATJ Low Frequency Variants Are Associated With Worse Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circresaha.118.313533 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina Mola-Caminal, Caty Carrera, Carolina Soriano-Tárraga, Eva Giralt-Steinhauer, Rosa M Díaz-Navarro, Sílvia Tur, Carmen Jiménez, Aina Medina-Dols, Natàlia Cullell, Nuria P Torres-Aguila, Elena Muiño, Ana Rodríguez-Campello, Angel Ois, Elisa Cuadrado-Godia, Rosa M Vivanco-Hidalgo, Mar Hernandez-Guillamon, Montse Solé, Pilar Delgado, Alejandro Bustamante, Teresa García-Berrocoso, Maite Mendióroz, Mar Castellanos, Joaquín Serena, Joan Martí-Fàbregas, Tomás Segura, Gemma Serrano-Heras, Victor Obach, Marc Ribó, Carlos A Molina, José Alvarez-Sabín, Ernest Palomeras, Mar Freijo, Maria A Font, Jonathan Rosand, Natalia S Rost, Cristina Gallego-Fabrega, Jin-Moo Lee, Laura Heitsch, Laura Ibanez, Carlos Cruchaga, Chia-Ling Phuah, Robin Lemmens, Vincent Thijs, Arne Lindgren, Jane Maguire, Kristiina Rannikmae, Catherine L Sudlow, Christina Jern, Tara M Stanne, Erik Lorentzen, Lucía Muñoz-Narbona, Antonio Dávalos, Elena López-Cancio, Bradford B Worrall, Daniel Woo, Steven J Kittner, Braxton D Mitchell, Joan Montaner, Jaume Roquer, Jurek Krupinski, Xavier Estivill, Raquel Rabionet, Cristòfol Vives-Bauzá, Israel Fernández-Cadenas, Jordi Jiménez-Conde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 34% |
| Australia | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Colombia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#628,791
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Research
#159
of 7,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,174
of 451,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Research
#7
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.