You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developmental trajectories of metacognitive processing and executive function from childhood to older age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1747021820931096 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Filippi, Andrea Ceccolini, Eva Periche-Tomas, Peter Bright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,819,331
of 24,456,171 outputs
Outputs from Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
#678
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,364
of 403,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,456,171 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.