↓ Skip to main content

EpidemIBD: rationale and design of a large-scale epidemiological study of inflammatory bowel disease in Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EpidemIBD: rationale and design of a large-scale epidemiological study of inflammatory bowel disease in Spain
Published in
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, May 2019
DOI 10.1177/1756284819847034
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Chaparro, Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta, José Manuel Benítez, José Luis Cabriada, María José Casanova, Daniel Ceballos, María Esteve, Hipólito Fernández, Daniel Ginard, Fernando Gomollón, Rufo Lorente, Pilar Nos, Sabino Riestra, Montserrat Rivero, Pilar Robledo, Cristina Rodríguez, Beatriz Sicilia, Emilio Torrella, Ana Garre, Esther García-Esquinas, Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo, Javier P. Gisbert, A. Abraldes, J.M. Benítez, M.R. Calderón, R. Camargo, A. Hernández-Martínez, E. Iglesias, E. Leo, S. Marín, A. Monrobel, A. Núñez, N. Ruiz, M. Tejada, Y. Torres, M.J. Alcalá, E. Alfambra, Y. Ber, F. Gomollón, A. Mir, M. Montoro, J.M. Nerín, E. Peña, R. Vicente, J.M. Duque, R. de Francisco, A. Mancebo, S. Martínez-González, I. Pérez-Martínez, S. Riestra, P. Varela, I. Alonso- Abreu, D. Ceballos, N. Cruz, E. Guerra, A. Hernández Camba, L. Kolle, J.M. Marrero, N. Pérez, M. Soler, M. Vela, J.L.F. Forcelledo, M. Rivero, R. Lorente, C. Verdejo, M. Montealegre, A.J. Lucendo, O. Roncero, A Bouhmidi, D. Hervías, L. Arias, J. Barrio, L. Fernández-Salazar, P. Fradejas, A.M. Fuentes, L. Hernández, C. López, L. Mata, C. Piñero, B. Sicilia, M. Sierra, M. Vásquez, M. Aceituno, M. Bautista, X. Calvet, M. Esteve, A. Montserrat, J.A. Gómez- Valero, J. Gordillo, C. Ledezma, L. Lluis, F.J. Martínez-Cerezo, M. Menacho, M. Navarro- Llavat, S. Rodríguez, M. Sabat, M.J. Sampedro, E. Sainz, E. Sesé, A. Silva, S. Torra, L. Torrealba, C. Vila, M. Ágreda Chinea, A. Algaba, F. Bermejo, I. Blázquez, O. Bosch, B. Botella, M.J. Casanova, C. Castaño-Milla, M. Chaparro, R. de Lucas, M. Domínguez-Antonaya, M.G. Donday, A. Durán, M.L. Galve, L. García, A. Garre, J.P. Gisbert, I. Guerra, P. Jiménez, B. López-Cauce, A. López-Sanromán, P. López, I. Marín-Jiménez, M.D. Martín-Arranz, A.G. McNicholl, J.A. Olmos, V. Opio, J.L. Pérez-Calle, R. Plaza, A. Ponferrada, E. San Miguel, E. Sánchez, I. Vera-Mendoza, M. Aguas, M. García-Sepulcre, A. Gutiérrez, B. Herreros, J.M. Huguet, N. Jiménez, N. Maroto, L. Martí, M. Mínguez, M. Muñoz, P. Navarro, P. Nos, J.J. Ramírez, M. Roldán, L. Pozzati, P. Robledo, M. Barreiro-de Acosta, I. Bastón-Rey, A. Carmona, D. Carpio, E. Castro, B. Crespo, M.T. Diz-Lois, A. Echarri, J.D. Fernández-de Castro, E. Fernández, R. Ferreiro-Iglesias, V. Hernández, A. López, P. Pérez, M.J. Ruiz, P. Vega, M. Calafat, D. Ginard, E. Iyo, M.T. Novella, J. Reyes, C. Rodríguez, V. Royo, A. Sapiña, H. Fernández, M. Fraile, A. García, B. Lapeña, S. Revuelta, R. Irisarri, M. Kutz, Ó. Nantes, C. Rodríguez, S. Rubio, M. Vicuña, H. Alonso, J.L. Cabriada, A. Castiella, I. Galdona, A. Maíz, A.I. Muñagorri Santos, N. Muro, J. Ortiz, N. Otegui, I. Rodríguez-Lago, K. Spicakova, E.M. Zapata, L. Zubiaurre, J.M. Castillo-Espinosa, M.C. Martínez Bonil, C. Martínez Pascual, I. Nicolás, E. Torrella

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 40 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 41 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,574,782
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
#68
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,313
of 364,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.