You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 needing extracorporeal respiratory support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Respiratory Journal, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1183/13993003.02463-2021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordi Riera, Sara Alcántara, Camilo Bonilla, Phillip Fortuna, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Ana Vaz, Carlos Albacete, Pablo Millán, Pilar Ricart, María Victoria Boado, Pablo Ruiz de Gopegui, Patricia Santa Teresa, Elena Sandoval, Helena Pérez-Chomón, Alfredo González-Pérez, Jorge Duerto, Ricardo Gimeno, Joaquín Colomina, Vanesa Gómez, Gloria Renedo, José Naranjo, Manuel Alfonso García, Emilio Rodríguez-Ruiz, Pedro Eduardo Silva, Daniel Pérez, Javier Veganzones, Roberto Voces, Sergi Martínez, Pablo Blanco-Schweizer, Marta García, Héctor Villanueva-Fernández, María Paz Fuset, Stephani María Luna, María Martínez-Martínez, Eduard Argudo, Luis Chiscano, Roberto Roncon-Albuquerque |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 27 | 35% |
| United States | 8 | 10% |
| Italy | 4 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 19% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Librarian | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 43% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#935,720
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from European Respiratory Journal
#514
of 8,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,574
of 514,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Respiratory Journal
#15
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.