You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The evolution of the ventilatory ratio is a prognostic factor in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03727-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoni Torres, Anna Motos, Jordi Riera, Laia Fernández-Barat, Adrián Ceccato, Raquel Pérez-Arnal, Dario García-Gasulla, Oscar Peñuelas, José Angel Lorente, Alejandro Rodriguez, David de Gonzalo-Calvo, Raquel Almansa, Albert Gabarrús, Rosario Menéndez, Jesús F. Bermejo-Martin, Ricard Ferrer, Rosario Amaya Villar, José M. Añón, Carme Barberà, José Barberán, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Elena Bustamante-Munguira, Jesús Caballero, Cristina Carbajales, Nieves Carbonell, Mercedes Catalán-González, Cristóbal Galbán, Víctor D. Gumucio-Sanguino, Maria del Carmen de la Torre, Emili Díaz, Ángel Estella, Elena Gallego, José Luis García Garmendia, José Garnacho-Montero, José M. Gómez, Arturo Huerta, Ruth Noemí Jorge García, Ana Loza-Vázquez, Judith Marin-Corral, Amalia Martínez de la Gándara, Ignacio Martínez Varela, Juan López Messa, Guillermo M. Albaiceta, Mariana Andrea Novo, Yhivian Peñasco, Juan Carlos Pozo-Laderas, Pilar Ricart, Inmaculada Salvador-Adell, Angel Sánchez-Miralles, Susana Sancho Chinesta, Lorenzo Socias, Jordi Solé-Violan, Fernando Suares Sipmann, Luis Tamayo Lomas, José Trenado, Ferran Barbé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 32% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,212,313
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,015
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,574
of 434,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.