↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroid treatment and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicentre cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticosteroid treatment and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicentre cohort study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00951-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Moreno, Raquel Carbonell, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Jordi Solé-Violán, Eudald Correig i Fraga, Josep Gómez, Manuel Ruiz-Botella, Sandra Trefler, María Bodí, Josefa Murcia Paya, Emili Díaz, Pablo Vidal-Cortes, Elisabeth Papiol, Antonio Albaya Moreno, Susana Sancho Chinesta, Lorenzo Socias Crespi, María del Carmen Lorente, Ana Loza Vázquez, Rebeca Vara Arlanzon, María Teresa Recio, Juan Carlos Ballesteros, Ricard Ferrer, Elisabeth Fernandez Rey, Marcos I. Restrepo, Ángel Estella, Antonio Margarit Ribas, Neus Guasch, Luis F. Reyes, Judith Marín-Corral, Alejandro Rodríguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 36 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 41 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,788,196
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#215
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,278
of 518,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.