You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PROREPAIR-B: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Germline DNA Repair Mutations on the Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.18.00358 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Castro, Nuria Romero-Laorden, Angela del Pozo, Rebeca Lozano, Ana Medina, Javier Puente, Josep Maria Piulats, David Lorente, Maria Isabel Saez, Rafael Morales-Barrera, Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia, Ylenia Cendón, Iciar García-Carbonero, Pablo Borrega, M. José Mendez Vidal, Alvaro Montesa, Paz Nombela, Eva Fernández-Parra, Aránzazu Gonzalez del Alba, José Carlos Villa-Guzmán, Kristina Ibáñez, Alejo Rodriguez-Vida, Lorena Magraner-Pardo, Begoña Perez-Valderrama, Elena Vallespín, Enrique Gallardo, Sergio Vazquez, Colin C. Pritchard, Pablo Lapunzina, David Olmos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 32 | 29% |
| United States | 20 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 52% |
| Scientists | 29 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 19% |
| Unknown | 88 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 93 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 749. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#26,616
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#22
of 22,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#478
of 448,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.