You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline BRCA Mutations.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.19.02399 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Lambertini, Lieveke Ameye, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Anna Zingarello, Philip D Poorvu, Estela Carrasco, Albert Grinshpun, Sileny Han, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Alberta Ferrari, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Laura Cortesi, Claire Senechal, Gianmaria Miolo, Katarzyna Pogoda, Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Laura De Marchis, Riccardo Ponzone, Luca Livraghi, Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Florian Clatot, Martine Berlière, Rossella Graffeo, Luis Teixeira, Octavi Córdoba, Amir Sonnenblick, Helena Luna Pais, Michail Ignatiadis, Marianne Paesmans, Ann H Partridge, Olivier Caron, Claire Saule, Lucia Del Mastro, Fedro A Peccatori, Hatem A Azim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 295 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 16% |
| Spain | 26 | 9% |
| Italy | 15 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4% |
| Brazil | 10 | 3% |
| Mexico | 9 | 3% |
| France | 9 | 3% |
| Belgium | 7 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 112 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 175 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 73 | 25% |
| Scientists | 46 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#144,425
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#258
of 22,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,813
of 429,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.