↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Laboratory Features in Anti-NF155 Autoimmune Nodopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology: Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and Laboratory Features in Anti-NF155 Autoimmune Nodopathy
Published in
Neurology: Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation, November 2021
DOI 10.1212/nxi.0000000000001098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorena Martín-Aguilar, Cinta Lleixà, Elba Pascual-Goñi, Marta Caballero-Ávila, Laura Martínez-Martínez, Jordi Díaz-Manera, Ricard Rojas-García, Elena Cortés-Vicente, Janina Turon-Sans, Noemi de Luna, Xavier Suárez-Calvet, Eduard Gallardo, Yusuf Rajabally, Sangeeta Scotton, Bart C. Jacobs, Adája Baars, Andrea Cortese, Elisa Vegezzi, Romana Höftberger, Fritz Zimprich, Cornelia Roesler, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Giuseppe Liberatore, Fu Liong Hiew, Alicia Martínez-Piñeiro, Alejandra Carvajal, Raquel Piñar-Morales, Mercedes Usón-Martín, Olalla Albertí, Maria Ángeles López-Pérez, Fabian Márquez, Julio Pardo-Fernández, Laura Muñoz-Delgado, Macarena Cabrera-Serrano, Nicolau Ortiz, Manuel Bartolomé, Özgür Duman, Vera Bril, Darwin Segura-Chávez, Kalliopi Pitarokoili, Claudia Steen, Isabel Illa, Luis Querol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,163,472
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Neurology: Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation
#349
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,137
of 444,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology: Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation
#24
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.