You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurologic phenotypes associated with COL4A1/2 mutations: Expanding the spectrum of disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006567 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Zagaglia, Christina Selch, Jelena Radic Nisevic, Davide Mei, Zuzanna Michalak, Laura Hernandez-Hernandez, S. Krithika, Katharina Vezyroglou, Sophia M. Varadkar, Alexander Pepler, Saskia Biskup, Miguel Leão, Jutta Gärtner, Andreas Merkenschlager, Michaela Jaksch, Rikke S. Møller, Elena Gardella, Britta Schlott Kristiansen, Lars Kjærsgaard Hansen, Maria Stella Vari, Katherine L. Helbig, Sonal Desai, Constance L. Smith-Hicks, Naomi Hino-Fukuyo, Tiina Talvik, Rael Laugesaar, Pilvi Ilves, Katrin Õunap, Ingrid Körber, Till Hartlieb, Manfred Kudernatsch, Peter Winkler, Mareike Schimmel, Anette Hasse, Markus Knuf, Jan Heinemeyer, Christine Makowski, Sondhya Ghedia, Gopinath M. Subramanian, Pasquale Striano, Rhys H. Thomas, Caroline Micallef, Maria Thom, David J. Werring, Gerhard Josef Kluger, J. Helen Cross, Renzo Guerrini, Simona Balestrini, Sanjay M. Sisodiya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,277,879
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#14,978
of 21,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,362
of 364,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#152
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.