↓ Skip to main content

Towards Regional, Error-Bounded Landscape Carbon Storage Estimates for Data-Deficient Areas of the World

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards Regional, Error-Bounded Landscape Carbon Storage Estimates for Data-Deficient Areas of the World
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Willcock, Oliver L. Phillips, Philip J. Platts, Andrew Balmford, Neil D. Burgess, Jon C. Lovett, Antje Ahrends, Julian Bayliss, Nike Doggart, Kathryn Doody, Eibleis Fanning, Jonathan Green, Jaclyn Hall, Kim L. Howell, Rob Marchant, Andrew R. Marshall, Boniface Mbilinyi, Pantaleon K. T. Munishi, Nisha Owen, Ruth D. Swetnam, Elmer J. Topp-Jorgensen, Simon L. Lewis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Kenya 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 147 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 72 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#162,343
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,738
of 191,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,843
of 4,294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.