You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Learning to Eat Vegetables in Early Life: The Role of Timing, Age and Individual Eating Traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0097609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha J. Caton, Pam Blundell, Sara M. Ahern, Chandani Nekitsing, Annemarie Olsen, Per Møller, Helene Hausner, Eloïse Remy, Sophie Nicklaus, Claire Chabanet, Sylvie Issanchou, Marion M. Hetherington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| France | 4 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 22% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 14% |
| Psychology | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#173,026
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,593
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,311
of 244,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 4,543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.