↓ Skip to main content

Changes in parental smoking during pregnancy and risks of adverse birth outcomes and childhood overweight in Europe and North America: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 229,000…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in parental smoking during pregnancy and risks of adverse birth outcomes and childhood overweight in Europe and North America: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 229,000 singleton births
Published in
PLOS Medicine, August 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elise M. Philips, Susana Santos, Leonardo Trasande, Juan J. Aurrekoetxea, Henrique Barros, Andrea von Berg, Anna Bergström, Philippa K. Bird, Sonia Brescianini, Carol Ní Chaoimh, Marie-Aline Charles, Leda Chatzi, Cécile Chevrier, George P. Chrousos, Nathalie Costet, Rachel Criswell, Sarah Crozier, Merete Eggesbø, Maria Pia Fantini, Sara Farchi, Francesco Forastiere, Marleen M. H. J. van Gelder, Vagelis Georgiu, Keith M. Godfrey, Davide Gori, Wojciech Hanke, Barbara Heude, Daniel Hryhorczuk, Carmen Iñiguez, Hazel Inskip, Anne M. Karvonen, Louise C. Kenny, Inger Kull, Debbie A. Lawlor, Irina Lehmann, Per Magnus, Yannis Manios, Erik Melén, Monique Mommers, Camilla S. Morgen, George Moschonis, Deirdre Murray, Ellen A. Nohr, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Emily Oken, Adriëtte J. J. M. Oostvogels, Eleni Papadopoulou, Juha Pekkanen, Costanza Pizzi, Kinga Polanska, Daniela Porta, Lorenzo Richiardi, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Nel Roeleveld, Franca Rusconi, Ana C. Santos, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Marie Standl, Camilla Stoltenberg, Jordi Sunyer, Elisabeth Thiering, Carel Thijs, Maties Torrent, Tanja G. M. Vrijkotte, John Wright, Oleksandr Zvinchuk, Romy Gaillard, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 92 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Unspecified 12 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 100 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#994,042
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,493
of 5,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,330
of 428,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#49
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.