↓ Skip to main content

Visual Search Strategies of Soccer Players Executing a Power vs. Placement Penalty Kick

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual Search Strategies of Soccer Players Executing a Power vs. Placement Penalty Kick
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0115179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew A. Timmis, Kieran Turner, Kjell N. van Paridon

Abstract

When taking a soccer penalty kick, there are two distinct kicking techniques that can be adopted; a 'power' penalty or a 'placement' penalty. The current study investigated how the type of penalty kick being taken affected the kicker's visual search strategy and where the ball hit the goal (end ball location).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 7 5%
Professor 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 50 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 50 34%
Psychology 13 9%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 52 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,060,719
of 24,171,551 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#75,684
of 207,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,389
of 339,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#811
of 3,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.