↓ Skip to main content

Care of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
62 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Care of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelines
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0240086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Blanco-Mavillard, Gaizka Parra-García, Ismael Fernández-Fernández, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Calero, Celia Personat-Labrador, Enrique Castro-Sánchez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 24 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#804,924
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,635
of 222,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,796
of 434,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#230
of 2,935 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,935 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.