You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts’ recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0248571 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Urruticoechea-Arana, Diego Benavent, Fernando León, Raquel Almodovar, Isabel Belinchón, Pablo de la Cueva, Cristina Fernández-Carballido, Estíbaliz Loza, Jordi Gratacós, Cribado Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,724,090
of 23,863,389 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#33,915
of 203,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,958
of 427,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#642
of 2,964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,863,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.