You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute otitis externa: Consensus definition, diagnostic criteria and core outcome set development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0251395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew E. Smith, John C. Hardman, Nishchay Mehta, Gareth H. Jones, Rishi Mandavia, Caroline Anderson, Maha Khan, Aula Abdelaziz, Bakir Al-Dulaimy, Nikul Amin, Rajesh Anmolsingh, Bilal Anwar, Manohar Bance, Katherine Belfield, Mahmood Bhutta, Ruaridh Buchanan, Deepak Chandrasekharan, Michael Chu, Srikanth Chundu, Katherine Conroy, Gemma Crundwell, Mat Daniel, Jessica Daniels, Sujata De, Sian Dobbs, Jayesh Doshi, Matthew Farr, Tanjinah Ferdous, Eleni Fragkouli, Simon Freeman, Samit Ghosh, Emma Gosnell, S. Alam Hannan, Elliot Heward, Faisal Javed, Deepa John, Helen Nicholls, Anand V. Kasbekar, Haroon Khan, Hammad Khan, Sadie Khwaja, Bhik Kotecha, Madhankumar Krishnan, Nirmal Kumar, Tamara Lamb, Hannah Lancer, Joseph G. Manjaly, Marcos Martinez Del Pero, Fiona McClenaghan, Kristijonas Milinis, Nina Mistry, Hassan Mohammed, Elizabeth Morris, Stephen Morris-Jones, Jessica Padee, Surojit Pal, Sanjay Patel, Agamemnon Pericleous, Asad Qayyum, Maral Rouhani, Haroon Saeed, Mirusanthan Santhiyapillai, Kay Seymour, Sunil Sharma, Richard Siau, Arvind Singh, Emma Stapleton, Kate Stephenson, Gill Stynes, Bharathi Subramanian, Neil Summerfield, Chloe Swords, Aaron Trinidade, Antonia Tse, Emmanuel Twumasi, Harmony Ubhi, Samit Unadkat, Ananth Vijendren, Joe Wasson, Glen Watson, Glennis Williams, Janet Wilson, Alexander Yao, Ahmed Youssef, Simon K. W. Lloyd, James R. Tysome |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 59% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 41% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,302,871
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,164
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,866
of 441,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#531
of 2,873 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,873 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.