You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relevance of Reference Centers in Sarcoma Care and Quality Item Evaluation: Results from the Prospective Registry of the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcoma (GEIS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oncologist, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier Martin‐Broto, Nadia Hindi, Josefina Cruz, Javier Martinez‐Trufero, Claudia Valverde, Luis M. De Sande, Angeles Sala, Lorena Bellido, Ana De Juan, Jordi Rubió‐Casadevall, Roberto Diaz‐Beveridge, Ricardo Cubedo, Oscar Tendero, Diego Salinas, Isidro Gracia, Rafael Ramos, Silvia Baguè, Antonio Gutierrez, José Duran‐Moreno, Antonio Lopez‐Pousa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 24% |
| France | 2 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,587,744
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Oncologist
#892
of 3,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,657
of 364,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncologist
#19
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.