↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry with High Steroid Exposure Who Did or Did Not Initiate Biologic Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 526)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of Patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry with High Steroid Exposure Who Did or Did Not Initiate Biologic Therapy
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, October 2022
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s377174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenjia Chen, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Trung N Tran, Ruth B Murray, Chong Boon Nigel Wong, Nasloon Ali, Cono Ariti, Esther Garcia Gil, Anthony Newell, Marianna Alacqua, Mona Al-Ahmad, Alan Altraja, Riyad Al-Lehebi, Mohit Bhutani, Leif Bjermer, Anne Sofie Bjerrum, Arnaud Bourdin, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Anna von Bülow, John Busby, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Victoria Carter, George C Christoff, Borja G Cosio, Richard W Costello, J Mark FitzGerald, João A Fonseca, Kwang Ha Yoo, Liam G Heaney, Enrico Heffler, Mark Hew, Ole Hilberg, Flavia Hoyte, Takashi Iwanaga, David J Jackson, Rupert C Jones, Mariko Siyue Koh, Piotr Kuna, Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, Sverre Lehmann, Lauri A Lehtimäki, Juntao Lyu, Bassam Mahboub, Jorge Maspero, Andrew N Menzies-Gow, Concetta Sirena, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Andriana I Papaioannou, Luis Pérez de Llano, Diahn-Warng Perng, Matthew Peters, Paul E Pfeffer, Celeste M Porsbjerg, Todor A Popov, Chin Kook Rhee, Sundeep Salvi, Camille Taillé, Christian Taube, Carlos A Torres-Duque, Charlotte S Ulrik, Seung Won Ra, Eileen Wang, Michael E Wechsler, David B Price

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,131,942
of 24,835,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#49
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,737
of 431,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,835,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.