↓ Skip to main content

Mycophenolate Mofetil in C3 Glomerulopathy and Pathogenic Drivers of the Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mycophenolate Mofetil in C3 Glomerulopathy and Pathogenic Drivers of the Disease
Published in
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, August 2020
DOI 10.2215/cjn.15241219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Caravaca-Fontán, Montserrat M. Díaz-Encarnación, Laura Lucientes, Teresa Cavero, Virginia Cabello, Gema Ariceta, Luis F. Quintana, Helena Marco, Xoana Barros, Natalia Ramos, Nuria Rodríguez-Mendiola, Sonia Cruz, Gema Fernández-Juárez, Adela Rodríguez, Ana Pérez de José, Cristina Rabasco, Raquel Rodado, Loreto Fernández, Vanessa Pérez Gómez, Ana I. Ávila, Luis Bravo, Javier Lumbreras, Natalia Allende, Maria Dolores Sanchez de la Nieta, Eva Rodríguez, Teresa Olea, Marta Melgosa, Ana Huerta, Rosa Miquel, Carmen Mon, Gloria Fraga, Alberto de Lorenzo, Juliana Draibe, Marta Cano-Megías, Fayna González, Amir Shabaka, Maria Esperanza López-Rubio, María Ángeles Fenollosa, Luis Martín-Penagos, Iara Da Silva, Juana Alonso Titos, Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba, Elena Goicoechea de Jorge, Manuel Praga, on behalf of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases GLOSEN

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#565,869
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#348
of 4,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,804
of 427,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#7
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.