You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treat-to-target strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3310/hta21710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allan Wailoo, Emma S Hock, Matt Stevenson, Marrissa Martyn-St James, Andrew Rawdin, Emma Simpson, Ruth Wong, Naila Dracup, David L Scott, Adam Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,762,265
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#545
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,232
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.