↓ Skip to main content

Experience and pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Korean neonates with neonatal seizures

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Pediatrics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experience and pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Korean neonates with neonatal seizures
Published in
Korean Journal of Pediatrics, February 2017
DOI 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.2.50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Won Shin, Yun Seob Jung, Kyungsoo Park, Soon Min Lee, Ho Seon Eun, Min Soo Park, Kook In Park, Ran Namgung

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam (LEV) in neonates with seizures and to establish a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model by using the software NONMEM. A retrospective analysis of 18 neonatal patients with seizures, who were treated with LEV, including 151 serum samples, was performed. The mean loading dose was 20 mg/kg, followed by a mean maintenance dose of 29 mg/kg/day. Seventeen neonates (94%) had seizure cessation within 1 week and 16 (84%) remained seizure-free at 30 days under the LEV therapy. The mean serum concentration of LEV was 8.7 µg/mL. Eight samples (5%) were found above the therapeutic range. No serious adverse effects were detected. In the PPK analysis for Korean neonates, the half-life was 9.6 hours; clearance, 0.357 L/hr; and volume of distribution, 4.947 L, showing differences from those in adults. LEV is a safe and effective option for the treatment of neonatal seizures with careful therapeutic drug monitoring.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%