You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computational modeling of aging-related gene networks: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fams.2024.1380996 |
| Authors |
José Américo Nabuco Leva Ferreira Freitas, Oliver Bischof |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,768,205
of 26,109,760 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#28
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,829
of 189,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,109,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them