↓ Skip to main content

Bi-objective optimization of nutrient intake and performance of broiler chickens using Gaussian process regression and genetic algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Animal Science, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bi-objective optimization of nutrient intake and performance of broiler chickens using Gaussian process regression and genetic algorithm
Published in
Frontiers in Animal Science, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fanim.2023.1042725
Authors

Hamed Ahmadi, Markus Rodehutscord, Wolfgang Siegert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,965,672
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Animal Science
#140
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,342
of 338,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Animal Science
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.