You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Arterial pCO2 prediction using saphenous pCO2 in healthy mechanically ventilated dogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Animal Science, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fanim.2023.1291233 |
| Authors |
Sara Ghilardi, Davide Gamba, Anna Maria Zanaboni, Paola G. Brambilla, Antonio Casarrubea, Pauline Drummer, Martina Balsamino, Dario Ghezzi, Cristina Ricci, Danilo Caristi, Claudio M. Bussadori, Giuliano Ravasio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,115,254
of 25,144,989 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Animal Science
#173
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,367
of 167,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Animal Science
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,144,989 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.