You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toxicological, biochemical, and histopathological evaluation of rats fed with macrofungal-treated cottonseed cake
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Animal Science, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fanim.2024.1343680 |
Authors |
Sandriele Goes de Campos Deboleto, Camila Aparecida do Nascimento, Jean Carlos Souza Melo, Aparecido Almeida Conceição, Ana Paula Fernandes Araujo, Clemente Batista Soares Neto, Robert Neil Gerard Miller, Felix Gonçalves de Siqueira, Simone Mendonça, Claucia Aparecida Honorato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,955,550
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Animal Science
#202
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,088
of 152,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Animal Science
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.