You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ex vivo DNA Assembly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2013.00012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam B. Fisher, Zachary B. Canfield, Laura C. Hayward, Stephen S. Fong, George H. McArthur |
| Abstract |
Even with decreasing DNA synthesis costs there remains a need for inexpensive, rapid, and reliable methods for assembling synthetic DNA into larger constructs or combinatorial libraries. Advances in cloning techniques have resulted in powerful in vitro and in vivo assembly of DNA. However, monetary and time costs have limited these approaches. Here, we report an ex vivo DNA assembly method that uses cellular lysates derived from a commonly used laboratory strain of Escherichia coli for joining double-stranded DNA with short end homologies embedded within inexpensive primers. This method concurrently shortens the time and decreases costs associated with current DNA assembly methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 22% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,583,275
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#317
of 8,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,448
of 291,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.