You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Super-Resolution Molecular and Functional Imaging of Nanoscale Architectures in Life and Materials Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoshi Habuchi |
| Abstract |
Super-resolution (SR) fluorescence microscopy has been revolutionizing the way in which we investigate the structures, dynamics, and functions of a wide range of nanoscale systems. In this review, I describe the current state of various SR fluorescence microscopy techniques along with the latest developments of fluorophores and labeling for the SR microscopy. I discuss the applications of SR microscopy in the fields of life science and materials science with a special emphasis on quantitative molecular imaging and nanoscale functional imaging. These studies open new opportunities for unraveling the physical, chemical, and optical properties of a wide range of nanoscale architectures together with their nanostructures and will enable the development of new (bio-)nanotechnology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 27% |
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 15% |
| Engineering | 16 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,122
of 8,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,159
of 243,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.