You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineered Transcriptional Systems for Cyanobacterial Biotechnology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Camsund, Peter Lindblad |
| Abstract |
Cyanobacteria can function as solar-driven biofactories thanks to their ability to perform photosynthesis and the ease with which they are genetically modified. In this review, we discuss transcriptional parts and promoters available for engineering cyanobacteria. First, we go through special cyanobacterial characteristics that may impact engineering, including the unusual cyanobacterial RNA polymerase, sigma factors and promoter types, mRNA stability, circadian rhythm, and gene dosage effects. Then, we continue with discussing component characteristics that are desirable for synthetic biology approaches, including decoupling, modularity, and orthogonality. We then summarize and discuss the latest promoters for use in cyanobacteria regarding characteristics such as regulation, strength, and dynamic range and suggest potential uses. Finally, we provide an outlook and suggest future developments that would advance the field and accelerate the use of cyanobacteria for renewable biotechnology. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 23% |
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 72 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 34% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,202,561
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,166
of 6,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,374
of 253,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.