↓ Skip to main content

Parts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parts & Pools: A Framework for Modular Design of Synthetic Gene Circuits
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Andrea Marchisio

Abstract

Published in 2008, Parts & Pools represents one of the first attempts to conceptualize the modular design of bacterial synthetic gene circuits with Standard Biological Parts (DNA segments) and Pools of molecules referred to as common signal carriers (e.g., RNA polymerases and ribosomes). The original framework for modeling bacterial components and designing prokaryotic circuits evolved over the last years and brought, first, to the development of an algorithm for the automatic design of Boolean gene circuits. This is a remarkable achievement since gene digital circuits have a broad range of applications that goes from biosensors for health and environment care to computational devices. More recently, Parts & Pools was enabled to give a proper formal description of eukaryotic biological circuit components. This was possible by employing a rule-based modeling approach, a technique that permits a faithful calculation of all the species and reactions involved in complex systems such as eukaryotic cells and compartments. In this way, Parts & Pools is currently suitable for the visual and modular design of synthetic gene circuits in yeast and mammalian cells too.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Mexico 1 2%
China 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 18%
Engineering 7 12%
Computer Science 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,293
of 8,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,039
of 267,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,500 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.