↓ Skip to main content

Improving Collaboration by Standardization Efforts in Systems Biology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Collaboration by Standardization Efforts in Systems Biology
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Dräger, Bernhard Ø. Palsson

Abstract

Collaborative genome-scale reconstruction endeavors of metabolic networks would not be possible without a common, standardized formal representation of these systems. The ability to precisely define biological building blocks together with their dynamic behavior has even been considered a prerequisite for upcoming synthetic biology approaches. Driven by the requirements of such ambitious research goals, standardization itself has become an active field of research on nearly all levels of granularity in biology. In addition to the originally envisaged exchange of computational models and tool interoperability, new standards have been suggested for an unambiguous graphical display of biological phenomena, to annotate, archive, as well as to rank models, and to describe execution and the outcomes of simulation experiments. The spectrum now even covers the interaction of entire neurons in the brain, three-dimensional motions, and the description of pharmacometric studies. Thereby, the mathematical description of systems and approaches for their (repeated) simulation are clearly separated from each other and also from their graphical representation. Minimum information definitions constitute guidelines and common operation protocols in order to ensure reproducibility of findings and a unified knowledge representation. Central database infrastructures have been established that provide the scientific community with persistent links from model annotations to online resources. A rich variety of open-source software tools thrives for all data formats, often supporting a multitude of programing languages. Regular meetings and workshops of developers and users lead to continuous improvement and ongoing development of these standardization efforts. This article gives a brief overview about the current state of the growing number of operation protocols, mark-up languages, graphical descriptions, and fundamental software support with relevance to systems biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 4%
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 95 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 19%
Computer Science 15 14%
Engineering 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 10 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,434,524
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#613
of 6,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,804
of 360,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.