You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Novel Perfused Compression Bioreactor System as an in vitro Model to Investigate Fracture Healing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Waldemar Hoffmann, Sandra Feliciano, Ivan Martin, Michael de Wild, David Wendt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 28% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 24 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
Materials Science | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,290
of 6,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,438
of 354,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.