↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Selectivity of Oncolytic Parvoviruses: From in vitro and Animal Models to Cancer Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor Selectivity of Oncolytic Parvoviruses: From in vitro and Animal Models to Cancer Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Assia L. Angelova, Karsten Geletneky, Jürg P. F. Nüesch, Jean Rommelaere

Abstract

Oncolytic virotherapy of cancer is among the innovative modalities being under development and especially promising for targeting tumors, which are resistant to conventional treatments. Presently, at least a dozen of viruses, belonging to nine different virus families, are being tested within the frames of various clinical studies in cancer patients. Continuously growing preclinical evidence showing that the autonomous rat parvovirus H-1 (H-1PV) is able to kill tumor cells that resist conventional treatments and to achieve a complete cure of various human tumors in animal models argues for its inclusion in the arsenal of oncolytic viruses with an especially promising bench to bedside translation potential. Oncolytic parvovirus safe administration to humans relies on the intrinsic preference of these agents for quickly proliferating, metabolically, and biochemically disturbed tumor versus normal cells (tumor selectivity or oncotropism). The present review summarizes and discusses (i) preclinical evidence of H-1PV innocuousness for normal cells and healthy tissues in vitro and in animals, respectively, (ii) toxicological assessments of H-1PV mono- or combined therapy in tumor-bearing virus-permissive animal models, as well as (iii) historical results of experimental infection of human cancer patients with H-1PV. Altogether, these data argue against a risk of H-1PV inducing significant toxic effects in human patients. This highly favorable safety profile allowed the translation of H-1PV preclinical research into a Phase I/IIa clinical trial being currently in progress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Bachelor 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,808,845
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,192
of 6,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,784
of 265,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.