You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Review of Micro/Nanotechnologies for Microbial Biosensors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji Won Lim, Dogyeong Ha, Jongwan Lee, Sung Kuk Lee, Taesung Kim |
| Abstract |
A microbial biosensor is an analytical device with a biologically integrated transducer that generates a measurable signal indicating the analyte concentration. This method is ideally suited for the analysis of extracellular chemicals and the environment, and for metabolic sensory regulation. Although microbial biosensors show promise for application in various detection fields, some limitations still remain such as poor selectivity, low sensitivity, and impractical portability. To overcome such limitations, microbial biosensors have been integrated with many recently developed micro/nanotechnologies and applied to a wide range of detection purposes. This review article discusses micro/nanotechnologies that have been integrated with microbial biosensors and summarizes recent advances and the applications achieved through such novel integration. Future perspectives on the combination of micro/nanotechnologies and microbial biosensors will be discussed, and the necessary developments and improvements will be strategically deliberated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 68 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 15% |
| Engineering | 19 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 83 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,051
of 8,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,987
of 279,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#34
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,500 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.