↓ Skip to main content

Building Synthetic Sterols Computationally – Unlocking the Secrets of Evolution?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building Synthetic Sterols Computationally – Unlocking the Secrets of Evolution?
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Róg, Sanja Pöyry, Ilpo Vattulainen

Abstract

Cholesterol is vital in regulating the physical properties of animal cell membranes. While it remains unclear what renders cholesterol so unique, it is known that other sterols are less capable in modulating membrane properties, and there are membrane proteins whose function is dependent on cholesterol. Practical applications of cholesterol include its use in liposomes in drug delivery and cosmetics, cholesterol-based detergents in membrane protein crystallography, its fluorescent analogs in studies of cholesterol transport in cells and tissues, etc. Clearly, in spite of their difficult synthesis, producing the synthetic analogs of cholesterol is of great commercial and scientific interest. In this article, we discuss how synthetic sterols non-existent in nature can be used to elucidate the roles of cholesterol's structural elements. To this end, we discuss recent atomistic molecular dynamics simulation studies that have predicted new synthetic sterols with properties comparable to those of cholesterol. We also discuss more recent experimental studies that have vindicated these predictions. The paper highlights the strength of computational simulations in making predictions for synthetic biology, thereby guiding experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,344,095
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,618
of 6,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,316
of 266,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#26
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.